We provide the most in-depth, detailed AI-based company due diligence assessment available on the market today.

24h
Investor-grade DD
Public-Source assessment delivered next day
1
Consistent methodology
Same lens, long-list to portfolio
3
Stages covered
Long-list · short-list · portfolio monitoring
~90%
Cost vs analyst
€2,950 desk work vs ~€25K boutique engagement

Same engine. Same vocabulary. Same evidence-graded scoring across every stage of the funnel.

Long List DD report → Short List DD report →

Urban Forests is a fictive example though closely modelled on a real company. The Long-List Due Diligence (DD) is based on public source information only. The Short-List DD includes confidential source (under NDA) information. The structure of the reports is identical but some of the data and assessment conclusions will change. See pricing →

Our Guarantee

If you get a report at the same level of detail and insights as ours — from anyone, at any price, within 3 months and clearly not plagiarised — then you get our report for free. One question asked: we get to see the other report.

"Wow, I really didn't expect it to be so powerful. I think I underestimated the power it has. Great product. The Mona Lisa of Internal Knowledge."

— Augustin Petre, CEO, SafeTrace

Methodology

We use the most sophisticated due diligence assessment model available on the market today. Three whitepapers document the framework, the architecture, and how it reshapes the DD market.

The Assessment Model →

The 37-dimension framework, the architectural composites, and the E0–E5 evidence scale that together determine the deal signal.

The Due Diligence Backbone →

How EviDimensional unifies the DD pipeline from sourcing through post-investment monitoring as one coherent assessment run.

The DD Market Model →

How the four-tier DD architecture accelerates DD and radically reduces handoff friction across the DD ecosystem.


The system at a glance

37

Dimensions of business value

Twenty-two pillars plus fifteen composite dimensions — customer, moat, team, capital efficiency, category creation, founder-market fit, and more. Each scored 0–100. Nothing is skipped.

5

Evidence levels

Each dimension is graded on a five-level validation scale. The system distinguishes between assumption, anecdote, and proof — and shows exactly what's missing.

7

Valuation methods

Seven independent valuation methods run in parallel — Berkus, Scorecard, Risk Factor Summation, First Chicago, Venture Capital, Comparable Company, and evidence-weighted pillar scoring. Outliers are discarded; the trimmed mean becomes the range.

6

Readiness gates

Six sequential gates determine investment readiness — Foundation, Positioning, Business Model, Scale Readiness, Scaling, and Impact. A weak result at any gate blocks progression, regardless of performance elsewhere.

500

Tarpit patterns

Over 500 known structural failure patterns across sixteen categories, screened against every assessment. Tarpits look like good ideas until they aren't — the system flags them early.

Valuation with uplift triggers

Every assessment includes a valuation range with explicit triggers — the specific things that, when proven, move the number up. Not a black box.

Assessment at any scale

One venture or a hundred. The same depth at every scale — without the bottleneck of analyst capacity or the inconsistency of individual judgment.


The ventures worth backing don't always look like it.
The ones that do aren't always worth it.

From the blog

On ventures, investment,
and the evidence in between

Investment Readiness
Your stage doesn't determine your round
Most frameworks assume your stage determines which round to raise. Your evidence does. We assess readiness across six round types — the gap between them is the action plan.
Selection & Assessment
The gold standard
YC is the most prestigious accelerator in the world. Here is how they select ventures — and what the results say about the process.
All articles →